Making Sense of the Two Candidates' Plans on Student Debt

November 1, 2016
  • Industry News
  • election

If you use the Wayback Machine, a site that archives old versions of websites, to check out what Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign had to say about making higher education more affordable, the answer is: not much.

The education “issues” page on the president’s re-election campaign site featured a single paragraph on capping student loan repayment rates, another paragraph on investing in community colleges, and one promising a college education to veterans, along with attacks on Mitt Romney’s view of each. Mr. Romney’s campaign site featured even less than that, with only vague language about making sure everyone could afford college.

Four years later, Hillary Clinton’s site features a 12-bullet-point planwith a link to a 1,271-word fact sheet about how she would address higher education costs. Even Donald J. Trump’s famously policy-light campaign offers more on the topic than Mr. Romney’s did.

The challenge of making higher education more affordable is now front and center in national politics in a way it hasn’t been in recent memory. It was a signature issue that drove Bernie Sanders’s surprisingly successful campaign in the Democratic primaries, and it has mobilized millions of young adults who are starting their careers burdened by debt, and the parents who share that burden.

Read more at The Chronicle of Higher Education: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/education/edlife/presidential-candidates-on-student-debt-in-college.html