Over the course of the last 14 years, I have both served as a Registrar and conducted several dozen registrar’s office reviews as an AACRAO consultant. It is with this perspective that I offer the following.
An external review provides another set of eyes on the complex and far-reaching practice wheelhouse associated with the registrar’s office. There are many reasons we get asked to provide an external perspective on policy, practice, staffing
and use of technology. Sometimes the request is based on a goal of the administration to move a particular agenda forward by helping the institution understand the roadblocks to change and serving as a sounding board for those involved in the
processes. Other times, we are engaged to help an institution streamline their business processes or evaluate the use of technology compared to other institutions.
One of the most common parts of these types of consulting engagements is the opportunity to work with the staff and help them learn how to identify policy and procedural roadblocks and pinch points which when addressed increase efficiency and student
satisfaction with the service provider. More than one institution has been able to take the observations and recommendations provided in the report and leverage them to reconfigure staffing, gain buy-in for funding for additional technology
implementation resources and update policy to reflect leading practice.
Another type of engagement is where the person requesting the review is looking for someone to confirm that what he thinks needs to be done is, in fact, a reasonable and good idea – a touchstone of sorts. These engagements are meant to reaffirm
what is being done well and provide a broad-based experiential perspective on what could be improved upon and why? To be clear, there is no “one size fits all” relative to how a registrar’s office should operate or be staffed.
However, there is value in learning what other institutions are doing well and how those leading practices could be applied to your institution.
The final type of registrar’s office review is the rarest of engagements, the routinely recurring review. Institutions that engage in this type of review apply the same type of logic of an external academic program review to institutional
services as well. That is, the institution sees value in an external perspective even if nothing is going “wrong” or needs to be “changed” but rather just checking in routinely to learn how their unit functions relative
to others in the field. If you have an interest in learning more about a registrar’s office review, please visit this page.
If you have any questions about Registrar’s Office reviews through AACRAO, please contact
consulting@aacrao.org or call 202-355-1056.